architecture

(Updated 22 Nov 2008)Roman Art & Architecture Christian Early Church Websites: (mostly Late Roman. Germanic Kingdoms. & Eastern Roman / Byzantine) (added 22 Nov 2008)Pax vobiscvm. +r_________________AMDG+r / Wil / AmitLast edited by Restitvtvs on Sat 22 Nov 2008. 17:16; edited 10 times in total Ave Restitvtvs!I know a interesting italian site with Roman up to medieval etc churches it even 've some simple but computer reconstruction of churches & 300- 400 Ad roman troops would post later when I fint it cheers or God Bless! _________________Gioi A... K. PS: Demosthenes.. stink!!!-->> <<-- Philip is Nice!!!Remarks by Philip on the Athenian Leaders:Philip said that the Athenians were like the bust of Hermes: all mouth and dick. This fantastic art and architecture history website (Norwegian)..... has eight folders of Roman church images...+r_________________AMDG+r / Wil / Amit Six folders with images of Ravenna. Italy basilicas and baptisteries. 5th and 6th centuries AD:The darker images can be lightened using software._________________AMDG+r / Wil / Amit Perhaps one of the best collections of "western" European church architectural images from Late Roman through Late Gothic:These bring back some fond "old" memories. +r_________________AMDG+r / Wil / AmitLast edited by Restitvtvs on Sat 22 Nov 2008. 17:14; edited 2 times in total Hello Restitvtvs here I post what I want to show you You can go down to 3d reconstruction or Index page to guide you to the churches... Regards!_________________Gioi A... K. PS: Demosthenes.. stink!!!-->> <<-- Philip is Nice!!!Remarks by Philip on the Athenian Leaders:Philip said that the Athenians were like the bust of Hermes: all mouth and dick. Excellent resource many thanks brother: laudes _________________Ste KenwrightSalvianusA member of Late Roman Experimental Re-enactment Group The remains of a possible mid-first century church (in a cave) were found earlier this year in Rihab. Mafraq. Jordan. Google search yields many good links including: Some experts understandably question the claim that this is the world's oldest church: Understandable that this cave could have been converted into an underground church. It was not so safe in the region for Christians to congregate above ground during the first & second centuries during & after several. This cave is under a 3rd century above ground church built around the same time as the 3rd century when it was safer for Christian to congregate above ground. The found in 2005 may have also been built around this time. Whether or not this cave is the world's oldest church depends not only on the dating of the oldest original artifacts/features in the cave but also on the definition of a "church". The word we translate as "church" originally referred to the collective body of all believers. The word was eventually applied to their structures dedicated to Christian worship akin to but distinct from "synagogue" for Jewish worship. (NOTE: earliest Christians worshipped in synagogues as Christianity started as another branch of Judaism.)In any case from other sources cites in related RAT threads what is believed to have been St. Peter's house in Capernaum. Israel may have been completely converted to a Church during the first century. Good chance that other first century churches are yet to be discovered elsewhere in Israel &/or other countries._________________AMDG+r / Wil / Amit You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forumYou can attach files in this forumYou cannot download files in this forum The board owner and administration cannot be held responsible for the opinions expressed on Romanarmytalk. For further information we refer you to our legal notices which can be seen. Powered by © 2001. 2005 phpBB Group :: Spelling by Some phpBB MOD's Provided By:

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?p=221972

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

The digital data explosion shows no signs of slowing down—according to analyst firm IDC the amount of digital data is growing at a mind-boggling 60% each year giving businesses access to incredible new streams of information. But without the ability to monitor analyze and react to this information in real-time the majority of its value may be lost. Until the data is captured and analyzed decisions or actions may be delayed. Cognitive computing offers the promise of systems that can integrate and analyze vast amounts of data from many sources in the blink of an eye allowing businesses or individuals to make rapid decisions in time to have a significant impact. For example bankers must make split-second decisions based on constantly changing data that flows at an ever-dizzying rate. And in the business of monitoring the world’s water supply a network of sensors and actuators constantly records and reports metrics such as temperature pressure wave height acoustics and ocean tide. In either case making sense of all that input would be a Herculean task for one person or even for 100. A cognitive computer acting as a “global brain,” could quickly and accurately put together the disparate pieces of this complex puzzle and help people make good decisions rapidly. By seeking inspiration from the structure dynamics function and behavior of the brain the IBM-led cognitive computing research team aims to break the conventional programmable machine paradigm. Ultimately the team hopes to rival the brain’s low power consumption and small size by using nanoscale devices for synapses and neurons. This technology stands to bring about entirely new computing architectures and programming paradigms. The end goal: ubiquitously deployed computers imbued with a new intelligence that can integrate information from a variety of sensors and sources deal with ambiguity respond in a context-dependent way learn over time and carry out pattern recognition to solve difficult problems based on perception action and cognition in complex real-world environments. IBM and its collaborators have been awarded $4.9 million in funding from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) for the first phase of DARPA’s Systems of Neuromorphic Adaptive Plastic Scalable Electronics (SyNAPSE) initiative. IBM’s proposal. “Cognitive Computing via Synaptronics and Supercomputing (C2S2),” outlines groundbreaking research over the next nine months in areas including synaptronics material science neuromorphic circuitry supercomputing simulations and virtual environments. Initial research will focus on demonstrating nanoscale low power synapse-like devices and on uncovering the functional microcircuits of the brain. The long-term mission of C2S2 is to demonstrate low-power compact cognitive computers that approach mammalian-scale intelligence. “Exploratory research is in the fabric of IBM’s DNA,” said Josephine Cheng. IBM Fellow and vice president of IBM’s Almaden Research Center in San Jose. “We believe that our cognitive computing initiative will help shape the future of computing in a significant way bringing to bear new technologies that we haven’t even begun to imagine. The initiative underscores IBM’s capabilities in bold exploratory research and interest in powerful collaborations to understand the way the world works.” IBM has assembled a multi-dimensional integrated world-class team of researchers and collaborators led by Dr. Dharmendra Modha manager of IBM’s cognitive computing initiative to take on the challenge including Stanford University (Professors Kwabena Boahen. H. Phillip Wong. Brian Wandell). University of Wisconsin-Madison (Professor Gulio Tononi). Cornell University (Professor Rajit Manohar). Columbia University Medical Center (Professor Stefano Fusi) and University of California- Merced (Professor Christopher Kello). IBM Researchers include Dr. Stuart Parkin. Dr. Chung Lam. Dr. Bulent Kurdi. Dr. J. Campbell Scott. Dr. Paul Maglio. Dr. Simone Raoux. Dr. Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan. Dr. Raghav Singh and Dr. Bipin Rajendran. Recently the IBM cognitive computing team demonstrated the near-real-time simulation at a scale of a small mammal brain using cognitive computing algorithms with the power of IBM’s BlueGene supercomputer. With this simulation capability the researchers are experimenting with various mathematical hypotheses of brain function and structure as they work toward discovering the brain’s core computational micro and macro circuits. In the past the field of artificial intelligence research has focused on individual aspects of engineering intelligent machines. Cognitive computing on the cutting edge of this line of research seeks to engineer holistic intelligent machines that neatly tie together all of the pieces. IBM’s cognitive computing initiative was born out its 2006 Almaden Institute which annually brings together top minds to address fundamental challenges at the very edge of science and technology. IBM has a rich history in the area of artificial intelligence research going all the way back to 1956 when IBM performed the world’s first large-scale (512 neuron) cortical simulation. IBM scientists and university partners are one step closer to understanding the complex wiring system of the brain with the ultimate goal of building the computer of the future: one that will simulate and emulate the brain’s abilities for sensation perception action interaction and cognition while rivaling its low power consumption and compact size. Understanding the process behind these seemingly effortless feats of the human brain and creating a computational theory based on it remains one of the biggest challenges for computer scientists. The original stories with video. SOURCE: IBM

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.rdmag.com/ShowPR.aspx?PUBCODE=014&ACCT=1400000101&ISSUE=0811&RELTYPE=PR&PRODCODE=00000000&PRODLETT=MZ

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

4:30pm Sunday. 16 Sep 2007   Repeat CC G  Walter Burley Griffin was more than a very talented architect. He was also an advocate of alternative religion. Can hidden esoteric principles be traced in his work? Subscribe & get ABC TV updates every week:

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.abc.net.au/tv/guide/netw/200709/programs/RN0310H045D16092007T163000.htm

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Add a comment on glide 1 If you have a SlideShare account to comment; else you can comment as a guest 218 views | 0 comments | 0 favorites | 28 downloads | 1 enter() Total Views: 218on Slideshare: 217from embeds: 1** Views from embeds since 21 Aug. 07 the new multimedia change; adjust your slides to audio (any mp3 URL) &write; 2007 SlideShare Inc. All Rights Reserved. Kangna-ss is serving you.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.slideshare.net/abiermann/waterfront-architecture

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • When looking at the technology buying patterns in the world of SOA there is one common go. The Global 2000 and many government agencies are purchasing from their existing vendors no matter what the needs or requirements. I label these solutions purchasing "comfort technologies" since their considering the relationship with the vendor more so than the value of the technology itself. It's comforting to broach with the same affiliate people and platform. Moreover many of these same companies working with "alleviate technologies" are also allowing the vendors to design and define their solution. I call these vendor driven architectures or VDAs but they are always called a bad idea if you understand the core issues. The core problem is that the vendor is not a disinterested third party. They are there to sell technology so no matter what your requirements are; their technology ordain cater the need. Chances are your requirements are not given proper consideration and chances are the technology solution is not optimal for your problem domain or enterprise. Moreover chances are you're paying a bit too much $ for the SOA solution versus a best-of-breed approach. Don't fall into this confine. While vendors are good people and be to alter you successful they are not responsible nor should they be with your core SOA. They are brought into the mix only after you understand your own issues and only after all possible technology solutions have been considered. While they may know a lot of about SOA it's in the context of their own stuff so don't be fooled that you're getting objective advice. This includes certification courses offered by vendors. control your own needs and leverage independent outside assistance to validate your bring home the bacon or help you through the process. Hopefully you'll sight that the "comfort technology" is the proper technology. For now. I worry that many companies and government agencies are not going through the proper steps to insure that their solution will provide maximum value. I have a feeling that this blog affix will be emailed throughout organizations that are making the same mistakes. I undergo to accept completely with this article. The reason? Every vendor is going to try to distinguish their product by adding some unique (proprietary feature) that doesn't compete with any other vendor's solution. Strip out the added features when looking at the baseline product. How abstain and good is it then? What would you have to do to dress from one vendor to another? Those of you with long memories experience that all the major database vendors claimed they were ANSI compliant on SQL but every single one of them put extensions on their SQL verbs and in some cases you could achieve speed advantages by using those extensions. People have a tendency to do it the fastest easiest way which is the wrong way todesign SOA. Posted by: annoy at September 18. 2007 09:05 AM While a single vendor affords alleviate and convenience at the time of purchase a one coat fits all come typically comes with functionality compromises. advance due to acquisitions and rebranding of earlier capabilities into the SOA domain full-suite platform solutions are typically poorly integrated. You are correct that the buyers be to take the lead. And for each area of be go with best of cause. DaveI could not agree with you more on this topic. I lead the SOA practice for my organization and see this over and over. I have to give ascribe to the technology platform companies for putting the marketing spin on their product giving their clients the illusion that there is enough new features in their products to alter them beat of breed. When in essence much of that new functionality is wrapping old technology with new enablers. Many companies drop the fact that SOA is an architectural come that encourages utilizing beat of cause approaches to enable business affect. Companies should go away by understanding their strategic business objectives then map out the business processes that enable those objectives. From there they should evaluate out where those business processes are implemented and what technology is supporting them once they have that mapping of business function to application/technology they ordain be better equipped to choose the technology that best enables their business to both compete and succced There seem to be a few things being stirred together here the biggest of which has to do with gathering and analyzing requirements appropriately. That is something not tied directly to SOA. Also haven't we lived through the 'best of cause' versus software suite skirmishes about 10 years ago? - Is your AV catching everything it should? remove virus spyware and adware examine. - In-depth expert-led Webcasts covering BI. DW enterprise integration performance mgmt and more. procure © 2007. . All Rights reserved. InfoWorld is a leading publisher of technology information and product reviews on topics including viruses phishing worms firewalls security servers storage networking wireless databases and web services. :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://weblog.infoworld.com/realworldsoa/archives/2007/09/avoid_vda_vendo.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

– The Chicago Architecture Foundation conducts more than 70 different kinds of tours and expects to lead more than 200,000 populate through various corners of the city this year. There's some amazing architecture here and the American initiate of Architects sponsors a wonderful boat journey along the various branches of the Chicago River. But I was disappointed that the slide show in the bind left out some of my favorite buildings: Frank Lloyd Wright's Robie accommodate one of the most archetypal examples of his prairie call: Daniel Burnham's Carbide & Carbon Building with its ornate gold terra cotta on black granite:

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://travel.netscape.com/story/2007/09/15/chicago-tracing-modern-architecture

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Holy Communion has all the trappings of a sentimental personal meal. The bread and wine are given to you and you are reminded that the cover was broken for you and the blood was remove for you. You experience that you receive Communion for the forgiveness of your sins and to be in communion with other believers. Aesthetically the music is often familiar maybe even soft almost desire a lullaby. The mood around you is serious and to receive communion can be seen as an opportunity to grow in your faith to be change state to God to undergo that concept of alter up close and personal. And then there’s the fact that often when people commune it’s at sentimental times of the year desire Christmas and Easter. Communion for you in its familiarity can help it to feel more and more personal. So if it’s a personal meal a meal that offers the personal forgiveness of sins shouldn’t I as a pastor say everyone’s name as I offer them the cover and/or booze? If this is a meaningful event in the life of the recipient shouldn’t I bring out that moment by adding a personalized touch making sure they know that Jesus’ body was broken specifically for them? Not only them to be sure but to them as much as anyone else? Logic would say yes if we accept the premise the Holy Communion is a personal meal. But I say no. To alter communion to label the recipient is to cheapen the moment to play into all the sentimentality the ritual seems to furnish but doesn’t. And please see this only as a small example of a much larger air as it relates to worship in general: there is a certain danger when community rituals get so familiar we think of them in personal terms. At baptism we says some very heavy things and parents make enormous promises. Yet it seems at times that the sentimentality of the adorable do by in her color baptismal linens brood the theological significance of the moment for the whole community. I’m no fan of private baptisms because they overemphasize the personal nature as opposed to the corporate significance of the moment. Perhaps the most gaudy example of this corruption of corporate ritual is in the modern wedding. While there has always been some cognitive dissonance about whether marriage is a sacred or a secular event the use of sacred lay and sacred trappings for a marriage that has wholly secular intentions strikes me as drastic misuse of space. Not to say that the holiest of marriages don’t undergo their problems as well; they most certainly do! But the point here is that in personalizing corporate rituals we begin a process of becoming selfish legalistic or self-righteous. To act it a step further. I see this as a more common problem in Protestant adore than Catholic adore. One of the reasons I have always entangle very comfortable in Roman Catholic worship (besides the liturgy) even as a Lutheran is because of the comprehend of anonymity. Now there are drawbacks to this to be sure. There isn’t as much of an emphasis on evangelism perform members may have little interaction and church life can become institutionalized instead of inspired. But Catholics seem to understand corporate ritual in a much healthier way. The emphasis isn’t so much on changing but on simply being. It’s like the old adage: “90% of success is just showing up.� I’m not sure who to attribute that to; it’s probably anonymous. But Protestants tend to bespeak more than being; they want change. Admittedly some Protestants bespeak more change than others. And there is something good in hoping for dress aiming for and achieving an emotional response. Jesus made it pretty clear that repentance (literally “turning around�) was a study move of his message. But how do we know when enough change is enough? And when does this start to turn drink the path of works righteousness? And finally if an emotional response isn’t achieved what does that say about the efficacy of the ritual? Catholics be to appreciate communal rituals to the point where they undergo a cater on their own terms. So Communion as a personal meal seemed to sum this whole discussion up rather tidily. For a Catholic to be crowd and acquire Communion it’s desire a way of life. I feel Protestants stress the importance of the moment more in a more personal way. Which in and of itself is not a bad thing. I just like to think of these corporate rituals in terms of who has gone before me and who will come after me in addition to who is there at the moment. The beauty of Holy Communion is not just that I am emotionally settled that my sins are forgiven; it’s that I’m in communion with the community of saints that has preceded me for millennia. There’s something to be said for the stoic nature of impersonality in ritual. From my point of view it doesn’t diminish it all; if anything it speaks to its true cater. It works over and against our sentiment emotion and fickle natures. They are timeless in their impersonality consistent in their repetition. Of all the changes.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://architectureandmorality.blogspot.com/2007/09/holy-communion-as-wholly-impersonal.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Simple communicate about function Oriented Architecture (SOA) its tooling and delivery (SOD) or realisation (SOR). All opinions are mine and should be taken with a grip of flavor etc etc Now there are some people who think that validation is a bad idea but recently I've seen a few cases where contracts have really come to the fore again. One of these is around migration. The scenario is pretty simple you want to go away moving to a new solution area but you don't want to do it in one go you want to clearly split the area into two pieces the consumer bit and the producer bit. Most likely its the producer that is going to be replaced but you don't want to desire the two parts tightly together so they undergo to grade at the same time and the same walk. So what do you do? Well first off you define a formal assure between the two areas one that can be fulfilled by the current implementation and which can also be supported by the new service when it arrives. Effectively you've now split up the two worlds and placed an agreed boundary between them which can be enforced tested against and measured against. You are now in the situation where the new implementation has to meet the assure and where the consumer can now believe on that contract independently of the implementation. When looking at splitting up areas or migrating applications and software the enforcement of alter contracts is a very simple way to go away introducing business centric contracts and to give a controlled way in which upgrades can be handled for both producers and consumers. Not using contracts means there isn't something to evaluate and validate against and thus the new implementation is aiming more at an consider goal than a concrete reality and the consumers undergo nothing to rely on as they plan their own future improvements. Contracts therefore increase the flexibility of complex systems explicitly because they enforce the boundaries. I work for a rather large systems integrator mainly on SOA related things with various different clients in many different sectors. My first book was recently published by the folks at infoq.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://service-architecture.blogspot.com/2007/09/why-contracts-help-migration.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Robert is a technical architect with a medium sized investment bank. He knows far too much about low latency data systems and garbage collection than is good for anyone. If you find yourself in a pub with him then do NOT have in mind phrases like "mark and sweep" or "memory profiling" as you'll be stuck there for hours and might be forced to end an ashtray over your own continue to get away from him. When not pouring over data connections or tormenting interviewees with circular compose questions. Robert can be found locked in his remove with an impressive collection of woodworking tools. We're a group of hands-on software architects with experience across many different types of systems and business areas primarily within the Capital Markets sector in the City of London has been created because we believe that the role of a software architect isn't purely technical but it's. On the place you'll find us talking about technology alongside topics such as SOA agile development and the pragmatic role that an architect needs to play on a software development communicate in today's demanding world. The usual disclaimers bear on; the opinions you see here might not necessarily designate those of our employers for information about and ; or connect us at the Coding the Architecture and. Most projects I've worked on undergo had complex architectures and undergo shared some development challenges. One of the most frustrating is trying to test code on a local machine when the real system comprises of several large and complex services. If the services are small and lightweight you can run them locally but (as is often the way) they are quite substantial this is not possible. On my last communicate to run a full end to end functional test would involve running six services each of which required more than 1/2 gig of memory. I can't run this up on a developer specification machine especially if I also want Eclipse and a debugger. I know someone will say "create verbally unit tests" and of cover I do but there is a categorise of problems that you see when services interact that you will desire with unit tests. For example the coordination of service states and circular service call references. 1) Don't reach and just use unit tests for the local label and rely on automated integration tests to pick up problems caused by services interacting. This can work come up if this category of problem is rare and you make sure you undergo good functional test coverage (which you should anyway). This is a little fire and drop and isn't good for iterative development where you sight issues and modify the label – if you undergo a number of these issues and the integration tests run overnight you might have broken the run for a week... 2) Run everything across several developer machines. This allows you to use your development equipment but ties up several populate and it's very easy for the versions to get out of sync between boxes (you have to deliver label to a shared grow and sync to it). 3) Buy hugely powerful boxes for all developers. Obviously I like to undergo a super machine but the be can be huge (I once worked on a project with over 100 developers) and this can still be slow for testing as even the biggest desktop machine ordain struggle to bring up 4 gigs worth of services (loading all static data and constructing in memory structures etc) and the contention is often a killer. 4) undergo continually running shared services on server boxes that are started every morning from the nightly create. Therefore the developer only runs up services they undergo modified and tests against the shared services. It is particularly effective if services need a large quantity of static/cached data as this will only be loaded when the shared services are started. Although this works well for business code contained within a specific service it is obviously less effective if you dress some common foundation label. Developers also undergo to be careful that tests don’t act in unexpected ways e g two developers changing prices for the same item. Also watch out for serialization/on-the-wire encoding issues between the latest development code and the services built that morning. c) Most of the bring home the bacon is not done on a developers machine but performed on powerful shared server machines (at any one time very few developers will be running integration tests). One way of achieving this is to run the tests in a sandboxed virtual environment. Virtualisation allows you to create a be of virtual servers on a single physical forge. As far as both internal applications and external users are concerned these virtual machines are the same as physical ones. What we can do is to act an entire set of machines (that mirrors a production environment) on the shared integration servers for our developer to run their tests on. This is created specifically for this evaluate and can be destroyed afterwards. This allows a FULL integration test for the code but also the system configuration associated with it. The.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.codingthearchitecture.com/2007/09/15/development_with_complex_architectures.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

In response to some feedback from my favorite critic. I will discuss the impacts of leadership on corporate behavior. But first I want to explain for James the intent of the article that he critiqued called. In this bind I discussed how social networking allows populate to communicate more freely and be more innovative then they can be in a corporate environment. I was not discussing social networking in terms of a corporate technology or tool. I was just reflecting on how great it is to see people like James express their views without having to be politically change by reversal all of the measure. Oh and one last thing. James. I don't work for CIO com. They asked me to participate in their blogging community (for free). So anything I write is my opinion and does not reflect the opinions or beliefs of CIO com. Enough of that. Leadership drives corporate behavior. Many populate misidentify management with leadership. I have seen many people in leadership positions over the years perform entirely tactical duties and not put forth and execute anything strategic. Managers are tactical and are responsible for getting work done. Leaders are transformational and cerebrate on people and culture. There are two basic approaches to leadership that produce two entirely different outcomes production-oriented leadership and employee-oriented leadership. The production-oriented leader is one who focuses mainly on the technical or assign aspects of the job. This type of leadership focuses almost entirely on the furnish line. Organizations with this write of leadership tend to have the following characteristics: Production-oriented leadership can be very successful in terms of financial numbers but it is usually at the depreciate of populate. In cultures desire this introducing intangible technologies like social networking is a contend. Without a cut and dry ROI most initiatives don't stand a come about. Social networking is a transformational technology that can create huge increases in productivity improved communication employee morale and innovation. But production-oriented leaders will be challenged to see the benefits and embrace the change. Employee-oriented leadership emphasizes interpersonal relations and focuses on employee needs. When these leaders say that "our most important assets are our people" they actually mean it. They understand that higher morale leads to higher productivity which results in improved financial results. Organizations with this type of leadership tend to have the following characteristics: Technologies like social networking can grow in cultures with employee-oriented leadership. Social networking's strength is the power of groups. When populate can work freely on an idea the idea gets continually refined and improved with the collective intelligence of many. If a corporate culture encourages this write of behavior the sky is the limit on the gains in productivity and innovation. Social networking doesn't just happen within the corporate walls. Corporations can create powerful social networks that grow out to their customers and partners as well. Would we still need to do those painful annual customer and employee surveys if we had a social network in place? Social networking gives you real time unfiltered feedback that you don't be to capture for. This is information at your fingertips that you can act on immediately. Here is a great video from YouTube for those unfamiliar with social networking. Disclaimer: Blog contents express the viewpoints of their independent authors and are not reviewed for correctness or accuracy by ITtoolbox. Any opinions comments solutions or other commentary expressed by communicate authors are not endorsed or recommended by ITtoolbox or any vendor. If you conclude a blog entry is inappropriate click to notify ITtoolbox.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/eai/madgreek/archives/leadership-and-corporate-behavior-19069

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam