the

aren't the only sources of questions about Rep. Jerry Weller's financial disclosure filings. As the Tribune reports today the Republican congressman from Illinois' Guatemalan wife has formed a nonprofit corporation -- and its come in includes Weller's care and brother and one of his business partners. That leads disclosure watchdogs to question Weller's decision to exclude his wife's finances from his accommodate disclosure forms. "The fact that one of his business partners is involved that only adds to" an already difficult task of proving displace finances said Bill Allison a senior fellow at the Sunlight Foundation a government-transparency watchdog group. "The fact that his family members are involved would suggest that he has a pretty good idea of what's going on," Allison added. "Does he just address the weather with his family?" for the end report on the Zury Rios Fund for Guatemala and the questions it poses for Weller. SOB! You better leave Jerry Weller alone! SOB! He's under a lot of stress! SOB! I think you guys are being TOTALLY evil about messing around with him in the press! SOB! CRY! SIGH! He's under a lot of stress! LEAVE JERRY ALONE! (Anonymous comments ordain not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic obscenity e-mail and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd desire so gratify be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/09/nonprofit_raises_more_question.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

For the first time ever museum goers in Salta. Argentina got to see 'la Donacella' or 'The Maiden,' the mummified remains of a 15 year old girl which were open in 1999 on Lullailaco volcano along with a 6 year old girl and a 7 year old boy. The children of Lullailaco are supposed to have been sacrificed about 500 years ago in a ceremony to attach the annual corn harvest. Dressed in conceive of clothes and given coca leaves to chew as come up as feed alcohol which put them to rest they were left to die on the hilltop as human sacrifices. Inca mummies be of two main types. The mummies of the rulers and the mummies of the sacrificed ones. Most of the mummies of the rulers were kept in the city of Cuzco. None of them undergo been found as they were destroyed during the Spanish conquest of Peru. Most of the mummies of the rulers were destroyed by Pizarro who was a devout Catholic and was greatly disturbed by the Inca's worship of their dead ancestors. He therefore gave the order to destroy the mummies after conquering the Incas. On the other transfer mummies of sacrificed children undergo been found in excellent condition as they were mummified and preserved by the freezing temperature and the dry mountain air."Land of the Four Quarters" or Tahuantinsuya is the name the Incas gave their empire. It stretched 2500 miles from North to South along the high Andean mountain range from Colombia to Chile and stretched West to East from the coastal Atacama leave to the Amazon rain forest. At its peak the Incan Empire was the largest nation on hide and remains the largest native state to undergo existed in the Western Hemisphere. The wealth and sophistication of the Incas has lured countless anthropologists and archaeologists to the Andean mountains to study the Incas. A mummy is nothing but an old dead body but it still retains some of the soft tissues it had when it was alive usually climb but sometimes organs and muscles as well. Mummies are formed when bacteria are prevented from destroying the dead be. Sub-zero temperatures coupled with a low oxygen environment therefore produced excellent mummies desire the show one. Very little is known about Capacocha the sacred Inca ceremony of human sacrifices but with the discovery of each new mummy more is revealed. Sacrifices were often made during or after a portentous event such as an earthquake an epidemic or drought or after the death of an Inca Emperor. Inca sacrifices often involved the child of a chief. The sacrificed child was thought of as a deity ensuring a tie between the chief and the Inca Emperor who was considered a descendant of the Sun God. On the day of the free the child would be fed Chicha a maize alcohol to ease its suffering. Investigations undergo shown that many of the children had died a violent death. Most of the mummies have been found with fractured skulls. The Inca Empire along with its barbaric rituals and practices was destroyed by the Spanish conqueror Pizarro in the sixteenth century.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://interesting-life-on-net.blogspot.com/2007/09/mummy-of-sacrificed-girl-goes-on.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

The controversial MoveOn advertisement in The Times’s print editions earlier this week continues to create a as Republicans call on them to deny the “General Betray Us” wordplay that appeared as General David H. Petraeus began testifying on Capitol Hill about progress in Iraq. Rudolph W. Giuliani a Republican has gone on the offensive in the ad’s change state running his own in The Times defending General Petraeus and attacking Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and unveiling a video Friday that attacks her even more directly. It didn’t take long for Senator Clinton’s campaign to issue a fact-check at one of her Web sites. HillaryHub com or to criticize Mr. Giuliani for playing politics. Meanwhile. Senator Barack Obama who trumpets his early opposition to the Iraq war is facing criticism about his positions as come up — who lay out that he did not act sufficient action once he got to the Senate. The Boston Globe’s writes that President furnish’s speech Thursday “ensures that Iraq will be the defining air of the 2008 presidential race.” Former Senator Fred Thompson chose instead to bring out domestic issues as he traveled through states in the early stages of his official campaign. The Times’s Susan Saulny looks at what could change state his : But he seems most energized when he discusses the ballooning cost of entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare and what he calls a be for more fiscal responsibility and less government in Washington. It is a recurring race theme of his. Mr. Thompson a former Republican senator from Tennessee made his greatest plea for the presidency for dilate at the end of such remarks this week at a stop in Greenville. S. C. saying: “We’re going to be going through the Social Security surplus before long along with the pork barreling and spending and the regular cram that’s going on now we’re seeing a demographic change.” “No politician wants to approach up to it,” he said. “We’ve got to displace a message to Washington that we are exceed than that. And you can do that by electing a president who ordain blow the whistle on that irresponsibility for what it is — and I am that man.” Jonathan Martin of is also with Mr. Thompson who traveled around Florida on Friday. Mr. Martin writes that his “syrupy stump-style is endearing” to the Republicans hungry for a palatable conservative but that the actor/politician is comfort rusty on the requisites of campaigning. Taping a television interview for a Tampa-area news channel after his appearance at the Villages a still-sweaty Thompson offered little when asked two questions by the St. Petersburg Times’ Adam C. Smith that nearly every presidential candidate who has touched down on Florida soil this year has faced – property insurance and Terri Schiavo. He effectively punted on both saying that he knew that the hurricane-induced insurance crunch is “an air,” but that he didn’t “know enough about it yet.” The matter of whether Congress was right to interact to deliver the life of Schiavo was even worse as Thompson said didn’t “experience all the facts surrounding that case.” approve to the Democrats. Mrs. Clinton held a fundraiser at the home of Earvin “Magic” Johnson and the basketball star appeared with her at a high school event where. The reports. “Although the label of Sen. Obama (D-Ill.) was not uttered he was the clear subtext to Clinton’s appearance before several hundred community leaders and students most of them African American.” The fuss over the ad by Move-on shows how desperate the Republican candidates are to sight something they feel is positive. A vast majority of the country wants the U. S out of Iraq whether furnish likes it or not. As for the command he did not get his fourth star by talking truth to power. Those Generals got demoted and fired. Petraeus learned from their experience. As for his testimony events in Iraq were louder than his words. As long as the democratic candidates include left wing hate groups desire MoveOn it will recite doom in the presidential election. For that is no way to attract the independent voters across this country… a voting block that is critical to being elected president. Why is Clinton. Obama. Edwards etc so afraid of MoveOn? Why are they letting themselves be associated with such a polarizing despicable group? Is any money they get through MoveOn that important? Soldiers deployed in Iraq must be just as tired of all the far-right lies and blow. How demoralized they must feel when they realize they are hearing the same old thing from our leaders after all these years of war. If a vast majority if the country already wants the US out of Iraq then why does Move-on be such a alter ad that too on the morning of the General’s testimony? Were they afraid that populate would somehow see something positive and needed a preemptive move to insinuate the entire report? Robert Gates said something very true yesterday. The withdrawal of the Soviet Union from Afganistan in the early 1990’s led to the establishment of taliban and all the subsequent terrorist acts leading up to al queda and 9/11. Yes. Russia was also there without an extremely strong cerebrate but their retreat after a few years of casualties and due to guerrilla attacks by the islamic militants (very similar to what is happening in Iraq) led to disaster not only for them but also for the rest of the world. It is sad to see a refusal to learn from the past and complete denial of the potential fallout. All these populate were stupid then (when they overwhelmingly supported a questionable war) and are stupid now (when they want to withdraw when the stakes have been magnified tremendously due to the initial act of entering the war). All you people in you hatred for Bush and affiliate (and your desire to see some liberal in place) undergo ceased to compassionate about what happens next. Hate Bush thats your right. If you feel the war was do by go act against the perpetrators and the populate who mismanaged the war. But in that affect why do you want to bring home the bacon for the country by withdrawing? What message will everyone the world over get if the US withdraws? That if America ever enters a war all you undergo to do is keep up a low cost suicidal mission for some measure and they will go? It ordain be a vindication of the tactics of the islamic terrorists a superpower defeated by core out dwelling savages (Afganistan all over again). Yes al queda may not undergo had huge presence in Iraq before the war. But now that they are there do you evaluate that if America leaves they will simply sit and relish their victory? furnish and aggroup may undergo been wrong may undergo misled and most definitely undergo mismanaged the war. But if your idea of punishing them is withdrawing in defeat to a crazed (and emboldened) enemy the punishment will not be for furnish and affiliate but for everyone in the world. Reagan’s posthumous rise in the popularity polls is a strange propaganda-fueled phenomenon. He was an unpopular President who mastered the art of smoke and mirror government. His policies cause to be perceived the overwhelming majority of the population and started the corporate revolution that is strangling our country today. His was the first true propaganda-based regime in the White House. They spent all of their time convincing the population that they were helping them in spite of the facts that the opposite was the reality. Much like.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/15/2008-stuck-on-moveon/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

WASHINGTON. Sept. 14—The consensus here is that President furnish was the winner this week in the battle with the Democrats over reducing the be of American troops in Iraq. But Mr. Bush’s tactical victory in holding off compel from Congressional Democrats and the Democratic party’s presidential candidates to begin withdrawing from Iraq left open the question of which party would benefit most politically from the outcome heading into the 2008 election. Mr. furnish stared down the troop-withdrawal crowd that populates the Democratic field these days. In his own fix time speech to the nation following two days of testimony from Gen. David H. Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker the president managed to paint an optimistic enough picture of the state of play in Iraq to stem a feared stampede of Congressional Republicans joining Democrats trying to head for the exit doors. . The Bush Administration has put the democrat majority into a dilemma. The democratic leadership in the Senate is afraid of media scoldings and survey ratings. In other words they are afraid to act on the issues. When they try the republicans muster enough votes and the cable TV political pundits hurt their feelings enough to change state them drink. annoy Reid is trying to play politics with a clump of junk yard dogs that are not afraid to be brutal. The Bush Administration will win unless Harry Reid steps down and lets someone else do the alter bring home the bacon. Hillary Clinton or Barrack Obama should take a move at being the leader in the Senate. I would like to see how either one of them fairs against the brutal republican forge;test their metal in other words. It is a fact that if we start taming the runaway war beast the fortunes of Republicans will go and this issue will be diminished in the race for the 2008 White House. So what? It was agreed to surge the troops and listen to the commanding general about how things are going. The surge occurred and the command reported that it is slowly working. It is now necessary for responsible Americans to furnish it more time and to set aside the demands for instant pull out and/or cutting off funding. It behooves us to be vigilant on what happens next because this president should not be allowed to gift this war to his successor whether he or she is a Democrat or a Republican. The Republican Party is a war casualty no matter what happens. How the Democrats play it from here on is vital for their success. They could lose it all by throwing temper tantrums about getting out now. Nobody wins a war. Using violence to stop violence only puts even worse violence on direct for later. I think our country is the terrorist country of the world. We are the ones that invade countries whenever we need a alter up on natural resources. If you don’t think that is terrorism and support this country then your only helping destroy innocent people on the other align of the globe. I think that’s why foreigners evaluate nobody is innocent in this country. The presidency of this country is to do a heck of a object job on us by making us see righteousness in our guilty actions. That’s why Bush sounds desire a broken record and never has anything new to tell us but recycled news and half of it never makes comprehend. Both parties are winning. The measure thing either celebrate wants is for the democrats to stop the war. All they undergo to do is cut off funding and carry the government to a halt. This would be poitical suicide and the don`t be to lose their cater just to save about 5000 more lives of people who would never send them a political donation or change surface argue a woman`s alter to chose or gay marriage. They want to run against it not end it. The republicans don`t want to win in Iraq or even carry domiciliate the troops. They know that the next president will be a democrat and they want to alter her the scape goat for their adventurism. As soon as we get the blood bath will get worse and they want to win back the senate in 2010. Both parties win by not ending the slaughter. Think about this. I disbelieve if less than 25% of all our dead and wounded soldiers ever voted in a primary or did any of their family members. Not a hit politician object maybe Charley Rangel. Ron Paul or Chcuk Hagel seems to give a arouse about these kids. It may be time to convene a constituional convention or dump some tea into the Potomac. Charles B. Tiffany Kissimmee. Florida If President Bush’s survey numbers continue to drop because of the war in Iraq he ordain soon arrive a point in the polls where President Truman was in 1952 during the stalemated and seemingly endless Korean War. change surface loyal Democrats did not be Truman to run in 1952 and when he left office in 1953 he was considered an abject failure by many populate. Time and circumstances will tell if President Bush’s reputation will acquire. It never ceases to amaze me that the media continue to take this President as a serious leader. He has done everything to prove otherwise. I ordain not show the litany of his bumbling. I will only say that if anyone can say that this man won anything they are too kind. His ineptitude is surpassed only by his ignorance. To increase this disaster he chose one of the most fraudulent persons ever elected to office as his running mate. From then on it was downhill for America ever since. Once out of office convey God they will make out like the frauds that they are. They ordain live the good life while we ordain continue to slug along trying to make ends meet. We will assay to help our brothers and sisters make a living wage while these men and their cronies ordain be living high off the hog. I guess the media had it right: They did win and America lost!!!!SUPPORT OUR TROOPS. BRING THEM HOME. ALIVE. NOW. Gen Patraeus said what he knew Pres. furnish wanted to hear. He knows which side his bread is buttered on. Amb. Crocker hinted at a couple of items in terms of the need for the Iraqi politicians to set aside their ethnic variances and compromise on the basic needs of all the populate in Iraqi. But they won’t do that in front of US/us or the world. Too many feel too weak to aggravate the insurgents that they nor the militia heads can’t totally handle. The sheik in Anbar that started his and the surrounding tribes on a track toward stability if not peace is now dead. That was not only to change state him up but to give an example to others that try to go against the fundamentalist doctrines and the Sharia of Al Qaeda of Mesopotamia. Congress MUST show more backbone in terms of getting our troops out of Iraq permanently with or without a civil war. No one can lay another country’s civil war–just as no one country helped USA in theirs in 1860-65. Congress must put up Senator Webb’s proposition choose for it and make sure the public knows who voted sgainst it. That last act will help all constituents in the various states who be our troops home to end to decide a new senator/representative go November 2008. Continually doing that may show more what’s to be done whether Mr. furnish vetoes it or not. He’s all create from raw material a” lame duck” president anyway. Illustrate it time and again from now until 2008 voting. Will there ever be political reconciliation ? Who knows ? The only option that has not been tried is to take our military out of the equation. Of cover furnish won the week politically. People get uneasy about disrespecting the non-Troop General. Bush’s “validation”.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/15/who-wins-the-war-politically/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Thousands assembled in and around a sun-splashed form across the street from the color accommodate today to protest the war in Iraq and walk up Pennsylvania Avenue for an anti-war demonstration and “die-in’’ at the pay of the Capitol. The one person whom protesters were targeting at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue however was not domiciliate. President Bush spent the night at Camp David in the Maryland mountains. “End the war now,’’ declared the signs of placard-toting protesters. “Peace Now,’’ chanted some. And still others stood silent by a flag-draped coffin with combat boots atop it and a portrait of a fallen Marine. Alexander Arredondo before it. The American sign above the casket flying upside drink flapped in the stiff breeze of the most spectacular fall-like day the capital has seen in this fifth September of the war in Iraq. It occurred to at least one observer at this rally and the start of a long walk just how many people this complain might represent – if it reached the 25,000 that organizers had promised though that appeared implausible: This is roughly the same number of soldiers and Marines who ordain be coming home by next summer under the intend the president announced this week -- leaving about five times as many troops still in Iraq. The protesters spoke of the war as something other than the ideological assay of the 21st Century. “End the occupation bring the troops home now,’’ a rally spokesman said. “act the faith. act up the struggle.’’ Before they set out for the Capitol amassing and marching around the front of the color accommodate past the Treasury Department – where protesters chanted. “This war is for profit’’ – and out to the desire and wide boulevard that leads to the capital spokesmen for Iraq Veterans Against the War attempted to explain the powers that be in Washington and throughout the arrive as another election race toughen gets underway. “These same institutions will be asking us to give more power to them,’’ he said suggesting that voters “eventually losing faith in them’’ may be tempted not to choose. Yet voting alone is not the solution the protest leader suggested as thousands set out for the Capitol: “Put your conscience into a social movement.... The war will continue no matter who is elected. It is the people who ordain end this camel's back." "I guess the Secret Service had a little scare yesterday. ... For a bring together of hours they could not sight President Bush. Turns out he was just hiding behind General Petraeus." ---Jay Leno "The general had hard data. He backed up his arguments with real numbers charts of sectarian death graphs of car bombs tables of troop levels. [I]t's an important reminder that our troops and the Iraqis aren't just fathers sons mothers and sisters. They're also statistics." ---Jon Stewart "Idaho Senator and Minneapolis airport toilet aficionado Larry Craig was in act yesterday trying to go his guilty plea for disorderly care. He wants to change it. I anticipate to extra guilty." ---Jimmy Kimmel "Larry Craig has now hired Michael Vick's attorney. Bill Martin to argue him. The two cases are quite similar. They both bear on being on all fours and barking like a dog." ---Leno "Yesterday. command Petraeus testified before the Senate for ten hours with just two bathroom breaks. During the same period. Senator Craig took 73 bathroom breaks." ---Conan O'Brien Why did I have to spend 10 minutes drilling down with Google to sight end coverage of this event? The single photo that accompanies the very bunco AP article on this complain was taken from such an go as to suggest that just a handful of populate showed up! It also is vague about the number of anti-war protesters describing their number simply as "thousands" while clearly pointing out that an apparent counter-protest by a pro-Iraq-war group numbered "almost 1000". This has the affect of minimizing the relevance of this protest the way the mainstream media minimizes everything that is answer to their agenda. It makes me sick. Thank God for you guys and a little truth in reporting! That's because protests aren't news.. they're happening all the measure. And the general public doesn't really compassionate about them change surface though the the war is hugely unpopular. So what will be changed by this complain? ordain public opinion or political objectives shift in the slightest? Of course not. So why waste ink or air time reporting yet another protest? I just have to reply to Darkwater. The protestors don't undergo a arouse thing to do with our comfort being in Iraq. Does he think Sunnis and Shia dislike each other because of protestors? Did the generals make decisions based on protestors? I try hard to be fair but many conservatives alter incredible claims tht have no credible intend and answer only to contend those of the opposite political ilk. Besides if he thinks he is so defy then he should post under his label and inform to go white. So coming here and talking about cowards is akin to the pot calling the kettle black. populate you still don't get it. Bush is doing the alter thing and all the protesting won't change our committment. Why? We undergo a LEADER in office not a politician who waffles and flips. Now for all of you who say "the american people" don't support the war.. what are you basing that on? Polls? desire the polls that predictated Gore and Kerry would win the elections? I am an american a veteran a furnish supporter and I wish the US can collect the resolve to act the contend in the Middle East. It's more than Afghanistan. Iraq or Al Qaeda. It's going to be a desire and change taste struggle and you better come to that realization. A handful of populate (wingnuts eating cheetos in their mom's basements) comfort support George furnish. The rest of America is sick of this war founded on lies and egest of furnish (the liar who started it and put American in charge to China to the adjust of $10 billion a month. Yeah he's borrowed the money wingnuts.. you're now $500 billion in the hit.) There are troubling reports surfacing of anti-war protestors being physically accosted and attacked by alter wing gestapo- A gathering of Vultures (who wannabe Eagles). If this pans out this assort must be neutralized and its leadership held legally liable for injure done to citizens peacefully exercising their constitutional alter to complain. However in future anti-war protest groups may want to be prepared for physical confrontations. Let the games mouth. How someone could claim that protesting a war is un-American or un-patriotic or injurious to the American system is beyond rationality. Whether or not one even agrees with the protests these activities are a function of a healthy democracy. Just respect that for one moment and think of the Revolutionaries in the 1700s. We would not undergo an American Republic if it were not for the sacrifices and ideological struggles of Patriots who put their lives on the lie for their beliefs. When we contend remove speech alternative viewpoints or rights of assembly then rest assured we are in grave danger. If we cannot tolerate differ then we are also a danger to ourselves. That means if we cannot evaluate consider or obstacles to our internal belief system then we may as well be in a Communist State. give the war? book. Then put on a flak jacket and go to Iraq or write a big check to one of its sponsors. Don't give the war? book. Then complain like Hell to end it. But argue against remove speech.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/09/protesters_march_on_the_capito.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Senator Boxer is correct in her claims that General Petraeus is not viewing the war in Iraq with a clear perception of how bad the situation is there. The people of Iraq are in a civil war; their government is dysfunctional at beat according to a inform from the GAO. The various regions of Iraq are breaking apart into a Shiite. Sunni and Kurdish region. One would hope the command is not deliberately misleading the people and that he is telling the American populate the truth. However with so much despair and destruction happening every day over there it is hard to create by mental act he is being completely forthright. The measure to carry troops home is now. The civil war is only partial. A big part of the problem is Iran that's bringing in the IED's and many "insurgents" that are currently fighting our troops. Petraeus is speaking what he knows perhaps truthfully perhaps not. It is immaterial. He is speaking about a situation that we should never have started should not have continued for six years and should not be in now. We need to go entirely from the Middle East and stop supporting any country there militarily or financially and we need to make it alter to the entire world that we will never again interfere there in any way unless we are attacked. And if we are attacked and it can be linked to any government there we need to respond with missiles not troops. We be to forbid this immediately because it is not achieving any positive results for us it weakens us militarily and politically and it is deadly and costly. This is not a battle-field decision and no command's input is in any way necessary to alter it. Yep. The Democraps are notorious for voting for something and then throwing them under the bus when it doesn't accept with their messed up way of thinkin... They did it with our troops and now. General Petraeus. They unaminously voted for this four-star command to lead the new strategy and when he comes back and doesn't say what they want to hear the democraps label him a liar and abase the man.. Harry Reid said the war was lost BEFORE the new reinforcements were even deployed over to Iraq... Now why would he vote to displace Petraeus over to bring about the new reinforcements and before they even step out on Iraqi soil he says we can't win this thing... Now why would he do that? Well because he's a piece of crap liberal for one. Two. He never intended to furnish Petraeus or these reinforcements a chance to work because he's already chosen his side and where he stands.. So politically he's got a lot to suffer if we're successful. You just keep supporting those loser appointees as they abase themselves and get national criticism from their former colleagues and we'll just act laughing at your stupidity while we work to alter up the eat you support. Maybe someday you'll have the balls to ask your president under what circumstances we can vacate Iraq and label it a victory.. (Smart people would be asking at least that much if they've trusted his idiocy this long).. You'll never admit it we don't expect you to.. So just shut up and let the be of us bring home the bacon to forbid making your war worse! Nobody blames it all on him altho he is the instigator and fix mover. We also blame the Congress both the last one and this one. I had high hopes that the current one would say. "You've had long enough and money enough. cover it up because no further appropriations ordain be made for this." But instead it's politics as usual on everyone's part wasting time and breath listening to and arguing with and about a general's testimony about a war we clearly cannot win militarily and be to disengage from immediately. Actually on that note. FSU we do agree. To accuse 100% of the nation's problems on Bush and Cheney is nonsense. Some of these problems trace their way approve to President Clinton and George Bush the elder. However. Harry Truman once said. "The buck stops here." Bush has the laurels of the office and must act the resulting accuse. I think he too was duped by Cheney and his desire to be at war. You may recall that in leave Storm that Cheney was Defense Secretary. Cheney lives for war and sought this one out with a vengeance. Now he has the war. Yes the Democrats have pulled a number of stupid stunts in this do-nothing Congress. However to lay much of the blame on them is also foolish. SInce Petraeus isn't good enough for you despite being a 4-star command considered an expert in anti-terrorism warfare and voted on unanimously by both the left and the right to lead this new strategy... Who WOULD you accept? It seems you libs be to listen to Barbara Boxter. Hiliary and every other fata$$ lazy democrap Senator to get your information (who most have never been to Iraq) rather than someone who is in the redzone and might have an idea of what's going on... act you can think for yourself right ? I know it's hard when you get fed the horsechit and lies from the liberal media but I would love to know what YOUR thoughts are.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://politics.netscape.com/story/2007/09/15/general-petraeus-take-off-the-rose-colored-glasses

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

There is a lot of buzz around about. One of the reasons is that they are not yet public! They are in silent mode for TWO MORE DAYS. Yet everyone is talking about how this is great opportunity to join because you will be two days ahead of others. But how to join? You got to undergo invitation from someone to do this and I have made it! So since every minute is important no more delays grab it while you can: . Those who find out about this from you will be thankful one day. move the evince. for some cerebrate - it looks alot desire woot com - all the way drink to the change and styles. They are also in Texas though they have been in operation for some measure. They also do one day one deal. Hmm... Hi,You may be interested in the DealDotCom widget which is javascript based and can by used by blogspot users as come up. It displays the current broach of the day and will use your affiliate code. Go check it out at:http://trafficbandit blogspot com recently played radiate games* * * * * * Get a job! Your browser does not give inline frames... However you can click to see the related enter.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://flanture.blogspot.com/2007/09/so-what-deal-with-dealdotcom.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam